Outerplanar graphs
Task number: 4061
Prove that a graph is outerplanar if and only if it does not contain a subdivision of \( K_4 \) nor of \( K_ {2{,}3} \) as a subgraph.
A graph is outerplanar if it has a planar drawing such that all vertices are incident with the outer face.
Hint
Add an apex vertex (a vertex connected to all the others) and reduce the problem to planarity.
Solution
Let’s have a graph \( G \) that does not contain \( K_4 \) nor \( K_ {2{,}3} \). We make a graph \( G’ \) by adding one new vertex \( v \) to \(G\) connected by an edge to all the others. The graph \( G’\) does not contain subdivisions \( K_5 \) nor \( K_ {3{,}3} \). Therefore, it is planar and we can draw it so that \( v \) is incident with the outer face. Then just remove \( v \) and we get a drawing of an outer planar drawing of \( G \), because each vertex will be incident with the outer face.
We show the other implication. Let us have an outerplanar graph \( G \). We want to show that it does not contain the subdivision of \( K_4 \) nor of \( K_{2{,}3} \). Let for a contrary such a subdivision exist. Take the outerplanar drawing \( G \) and add to the outer face the vertex \( v \) adjacent with all vertices of the graph \( G \). The resulting graph will be planar. In addition, it will contain a subdivision of \( K_5 \) or of \( K_{3{,}3} \) and this is a contradiction with Kuratowski theorem, that planar graphs do not contain subdivisions of \( K_5 \) nor of \( K_{3{,}3} \).
Variant
Prove the above characterization of outerplanar graphs without using Kuratowski’s theorem.
Solution
Forward implication: neither \( K_4 \) nor \( K_ {2{,}3} \) can be drawn in the outerplanar way, because the outer cycle always separates the remaining vertex.
Replacing paths with edges preserves outerplanarity. If the subdivision of \( K_4 \) was outerplanar, the \( K_4 \) itself would be outerplanar. Similarly for \( K_{2{,}3} \). Therefore, an outerplanar graph cannot have a subdivision of \( K_4 \) nor of \( K_{2{,}3} \).
We can prove the backward implication by induction according to the number of edges. Joining outerplanar drawings by a bridge or by an articulation preserves the outerplanarity. Without loss of generality, we can restrict ourselves to two-connected graphs. These can be created from cycles by adding ears.
The basis of induction, cycles, are outerplanar.
We find in the \( G \) an ear. According to the inductive hypothesis, \( G \) without the ear has an outerplanar drawing. Because this graph is two-connected, the outer face is surrounded by a cycle. The following cases may occur:
- The ear is of length at least two and connects two adjacent vertices of the cycle, then we draw it to the outside this edge.
- The ear is of length at least two and connects the non-adjacent vertices of the cycle, then \( G \) has a subdivision of \( K_ {2{,}3} \) and therefore this cannot happen.
- The ear is an edge and connects two non-adjacent vertices of the cycle from the same inner face, then we draw it into this face.
- The ear is an edge and connects two non-adjacent vertices of the cycle in different inner faces, then \( G \) has a subdivision of \( K_4 \) and therefore this cannot happen.