Task list filter?

Choose required ranks and required tasks. The table of contents will list only tasks having one of the required ranks in corresponding rankings and at least one of the required tags (overall). If you wish to filter only according to some rankings or tags, leave the other groups empty.

Task rankings

Difficulty level

Task tags

Task type
«
«
«

Outerplanar graphs

Task number: 4061

Prove that a graph is outerplanar if and only if it does not contain a subdivision of K4 nor of K2,3 as a subgraph.

A graph is outerplanar if it has a planar drawing such that all vertices are incident with the outer face.

  • Hint

    Add an apex vertex (a vertex connected to all the others) and reduce the problem to planarity.

  • Solution

    Let’s have a graph G that does not contain K4 nor K2,3. We make a graph G by adding one new vertex v to G connected by an edge to all the others. The graph G does not contain subdivisions K5 nor K3,3. Therefore, it is planar and we can draw it so that v is incident with the outer face. Then just remove v and we get a drawing of an outer planar drawing of G, because each vertex will be incident with the outer face.

    We show the other implication. Let us have an outerplanar graph G. We want to show that it does not contain the subdivision of K4 nor of K2,3. Let for a contrary such a subdivision exist. Take the outerplanar drawing G and add to the outer face the vertex v adjacent with all vertices of the graph G. The resulting graph will be planar. In addition, it will contain a subdivision of K5 or of K3,3 and this is a contradiction with Kuratowski theorem, that planar graphs do not contain subdivisions of K5 nor of K3,3.

  • Variant

    Prove the above characterization of outerplanar graphs without using Kuratowski’s theorem.

  • Solution

    Forward implication: neither K4 nor K2,3 can be drawn in the outerplanar way, because the outer cycle always separates the remaining vertex.

    Replacing paths with edges preserves outerplanarity. If the subdivision of K4 was outerplanar, the K4 itself would be outerplanar. Similarly for K2,3. Therefore, an outerplanar graph cannot have a subdivision of K4 nor of K2,3.

    We can prove the backward implication by induction according to the number of edges. Joining outerplanar drawings by a bridge or by an articulation preserves the outerplanarity. Without loss of generality, we can restrict ourselves to two-connected graphs. These can be created from cycles by adding ears.

    The basis of induction, cycles, are outerplanar.

    We find in the G an ear. According to the inductive hypothesis, G without the ear has an outerplanar drawing. Because this graph is two-connected, the outer face is surrounded by a cycle. The following cases may occur:

    • The ear is of length at least two and connects two adjacent vertices of the cycle, then we draw it to the outside this edge.
    • The ear is of length at least two and connects the non-adjacent vertices of the cycle, then G has a subdivision of K2,3 and therefore this cannot happen.
    • The ear is an edge and connects two non-adjacent vertices of the cycle from the same inner face, then we draw it into this face.
    • The ear is an edge and connects two non-adjacent vertices of the cycle in different inner faces, then G has a subdivision of K4 and therefore this cannot happen.
Difficulty level: Moderate task
Proving or derivation task
Solution require uncommon idea
Cs translation
Send comment on task by email